Shortly after entering into this express contract with Lee, Michelle gave up her successful artist career to devote herself full time to Lee. In exchange, Lee had agreed to provide for Michelle`s financial needs for the rest of her life. Michelle stated that she completed her end of the agreement during the period during which she lived with Lee, which lasted from October 1964 to May 1970. Mutual promises are not necessary to form a treaty. Unilateral contracts in which one party performs an act in exchange for the promise of the other party are also valid. Offering a reward – to catch a criminal or to make a cat lost – is an example of a unilateral contract: there is an offer on one side, and the other party accepts by taking the requested action. As the terms of explicit contracts are clearly defined, the parties will have a clear idea of their rights and obligations. There are two categories of contracts: express and tacit contracts. In order for a contract to be considered an explicit contract, clear and clear conditions must be set for a promise to be made between the parties.
However, the explicit terms cannot be the entirety of the contract. In the circumstances of the case, unspoken contracts are entered into against the conduct of the parties. Formal rules for contract formation, which generally apply to contract formation, are applied. A contract is not implied if it results in injustice or prejudice. In the event of doubts and discrepancies in the minds of the parties, the Tribunal cannot enter into a contractual relationship. If, at the expiry of a contract, the parties continue to work on their terms, the result is that they have mutually committed to a new contract containing the same provisions as the old one. Believe it or not, explicit and implied terms are the terms of an explicit contract. Their intention to be bound by the treaty is also clearly communicated.
In order for an explicit contract to be concluded, its terms must be clearly accepted by the parties. A quasi-contract (by law) – unlike explicit and tacit contracts that embody a real agreement of the parties – is an obligation called “prescribed by law” to avoid the unjust enrichment of one person to the detriment of another.